Thank you. I appreciate that.
You've accepted the recommendations, and going forward you're going to look towards implementing them, but I do sense that there's a bit of a disagreement between what the ombudsman found in this particular case, this particular contract, and what you yourself believe to have been robust justification for why McKinsey was the only contractor that would have been able to hold the exclusive rights to this contract.
What mechanisms are in place for PSPC to push back on, say, another department's justification? If you don't believe they've provided robust justification, what are the mechanisms in place to push back on that?