I appreciate that. I hate to cut you off, but I have a few more questions that I want to make sure we get in.
One of the things that are of great concern is this point about the small percentage of people. I think it's important for politicians of all political stripes to understand that most small businesses are not sole proprietorships. In other words, people don't own the assets directly. They're owned through companies.
This change is inherently unfair, because you can have two businesses that are exactly the same. You can have a hair salon that's owned as a sole proprietorship right next to one that's owned in a small business corporation. One gets the $250,000 exemption, and the other doesn't. If you count those people, who are no different from the sole proprietors, it's way higher, is it not?