The finance minister likes to argue that it's not fair that somebody working pays tax on 100% of their income, but somebody who makes an investment by taking a risk and who makes a capital gain doesn't pay tax on 100% of that income. They see that as being inherently unfair. You know, I'm willing to give some openness to hearing that argument. I mean, on the face of it, it seems that way.
However, is this not the reality of the end result of that argument? If you were to make 100% of a capital gain taxable—and say the inclusion rate was 100%—what effect do you think that would have on risk-taking across multiple sectors of industry in Canada?