Thanks very much for that question.
As I understand it, Germany does a very good job, but I have not studied Germany so I can't answer along that line. In terms of the U.K., Australia and Canada, the three countries I have looked at, basically nobody does a good job. Everybody has trouble. That's why all three countries have been looking at possible solutions.
In terms of the transferable lessons, I think the modular one is transferable to Canada. As I mentioned, I would not build in different locations and bring things together into one location. Australia learned that the hard way.
In terms of whether or not Britain's new top-down shipbuilding czar is working, it's only been two and a half years, and already they've decided to centralize it still more with this National Shipbuilding Office. However, there have been some successes in the British system. One of the successes is Britain's documentation, for example, with the national shipbuilding strategy refresh that was released about a month ago. It talks about export success. One of the export successes it talks about is exporting the Type 26 to Canada and Australia and the Type 31 to Portugal and Indonesia.
Some of the ways in which they're doing things are starting to have traction. Britain has experimented with a number of different things over the past 10 years, and this is where they've arrived. They have seen problems and have tried to adapt to the problems.
I would say that, in our case, we see problems but we have not changed our defence procurement strategy since 2014, since the committee of the deputy ministers, and we haven't seen any progress. I think it's time to relook at that.