There are a couple of ways forward here that I see, but everyone can please weigh in.
On your amendment, it was kind of a shemozzle. I don't know how that will translate. Your amendment is actually an out-of-order amendment because it doesn't amend; it completely replaces Mr. Genuis's. At the time, we should have ruled it out of order, but the committee kind of pushed together a way forward, as we often do, less formally.
It's not perfect, so we have a couple of ways forward. One is that the subcommittee is not happening because we did not receive names. We're obviously down to our last day. We can choose to revise this when we come back in September, which will give plenty of time to look at the documents I think you're asking for, and then, present a new motion come September, ignoring this and ignoring your out-of-order amendment that we used to push together one complete motion.
We can move forward that way, if the committee chooses. The other way forward is that the committee can now decide on a whole new motion, but we have the minister in a few minutes.
I'm going to interrupt here.
Mr. Anderson, I apologize. Because of late votes, and because we have our next witness coming here at 5:30, we're not going to have any time. I'll let you know that we can excuse you, and the intent is that we will bring you back at a future date. I hope you are local. We will bring you back at a future date.
The original intent was to write the report over the summer, but I think we will have you back, and then we'll write the report then.