I don't know what each of those firms did. I didn't look at the individual contracts or what their deliverables were, so I really can't comment on the value for money. However, I will say, in looking at the patterns we saw in the data, that we have very good reason to believe that the pooling of contracts in a small number of firms and also the general practices around how we manage IT procurement suggest that there would not be value for many of the IT contracts that we're striking, just even at the basic level of how much money is going into each of those individual contracts.
