Yes. That's such a good question.
One of the reasons public servants will often offer when explaining why contracts are so big—as Mr. Boots referred to—that there's a habituation to large-scale projects and a misperception, frankly, that we need to be spending in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. In some cases, I think, there are vendors that the federal government is used to turning to, and those vendors know that they can charge those amounts of money to deliver on these projects.
This gets to the question around what the rules are. Partially, the administrative burdens internally imposed on public servants to put up a request for proposals and to go through a contracting process are so high that you can be incentivized to go big because, “Well, we want to get as much money as we may need for this project, and we don't want to have to do it over and over again,” so reducing those internal burdens would be a really big driver of incentivizing smaller contracting.