I should clarify that it's not that an individual project or initiative would only cost $2 million a year over three years. We know you can't revamp and upgrade all of the benefits delivery programs, which is something currently under way for $6 million. It's that individual project components and those individual contracts shouldn't exceed those amounts.
Part of this is just that if a vendor underperforms, you can say “bye-bye” very easily. You're not locked in, and you also create scope to change what the deliverables are by having the opportunity to create new contracts as you go. It's by no means saying that you can deliver some of these large projects for that low dollar amount. It's that individual contracts shouldn't exceed that amount. This is where the idea of modular contracting comes in and of bringing together smaller pieces of a project and putting them together.
I don't know if I'm allowed to pass it to Sean, but he has lots to say about this, because I know he has thought quite a lot about how to implement modular contracting.
Sean, did you want to add ideas to this?