You understand that the tour of silence, on top of the email that says you were involved, kind of suggests that members of this committee and the public have a reason to be a bit skeptical about aspects of your testimony.
I want to try to get one more question in.
The government is purchasing a $9-million luxury condo for you to live in. We understand that a consul general would entertain guests in their residence, but obviously, the whole residence is not for entertainment. You're not going to be inviting prospective investors into your bedroom, for example.
Now, we have the floor plan of the new space. Would you accept that this luxury condo has a much smaller percentage of representational space and that the tradeoff is much less representational space and much more luxurious personal space? Would you acknowledge that, based on what you've seen in the tour?