Just very briefly, there is no contradiction whatsoever between saying that the minister should answer questions about this important matter related to her portfolio and also saying that we have enough information now to come to the conclusion that this purchase should not have been made.
Now we're going to have a vote and a majority of the committee will have its way. If our view isn't reflective of the majority view, then so be it. However, our view is that the minister should appear to give an account for what has happened, especially when the original property hasn't been sold, and that we have enough information at this point to come to the conclusion that the purchase of this $9-million condo on Billionaires' Row....
We have this sort of phantom math being created about the first property selling at asking price versus the actual price of the new property. Right now, we just own two consul general's residences. We're paying the carrying costs for both for as long as we hold both. I think there's no contradiction there. This committee will vote, and the public will draw their conclusions based on whether people vote in favour of or against our motion saying that making this purchase was not an appropriate decision.