I'm just going to jump in because I'm running out of time.
The irony of this, though, is that this government has for so long been reluctant to hold these big corporations accountable for what happened in the opioid crisis. Your criteria for considering them eligible for procurement—whether or not they've been held accountable for these actions—isn't triggered precisely because this government has failed to take actions to hold these companies accountable. There is a close relationship between Dominic Barton, McKinsey and the government, a failure to hold them accountable and then that lack of accountability being invoked as a justification for continuing to use them to procure services.
Meanwhile, so many Canadians have suffered as a result of the opioid crisis. McKinsey and Purdue have had to pay massive compensation in the United States. McKinsey alone, I think, has had to pay half a billion dollars in the United States. They're not being held accountable because of the cozy relationship we see between these big corporations and the government.