Thank you for your question.
I would say that one of the things we've taken to heart is the need to, at the front, define the statement of work and what it is we want to see, define a procurement process and rationalize why we're choosing that process against that statement of work. That alone will reduce significantly any ability to actually have favouritism. For more significant contracts, within PSPC we put in place a procurement review committee, where we're actually bringing in those statements of work and those procurement strategies early on in the process for another layer of due diligence to ensure that we have a strategy that is rational, makes sense and can stand probity.
I think by having those measures in place, we will reduce the risk of having favouritism. Again, as you mentioned, it's a very large organization. In a department there's always an opportunity that someone could favour one group or another, but we are taking measures to really reduce that risk and to bring more due diligence to avoid it.