Yes, definitely.
I think I support the spirit of the amendment. To me, I'm somewhat agnostic. The idea here is that we're going to have three meetings to talk about this issue, and it comes down to whether we include pejorative language characterizing the audit. I don't know if you pass or fail an audit like that. I think calling it a “scathing audit” would be accurate, but again, the point here is to kick off a study to get answers and hold people accountable. I think the simplified wording does that nicely, and I support the amendment as suggested.