Right, of course, but.... This is, I guess, just a problem of accountability, though.
I'm looking at the recipient's name. If there's a partnership between a Canadian and an American institution, you would probably expect that the Canadian institution might be applying for funding in Canada and the American institution might be applying for funding in the United States, and those institutions are entering into a partnership using funding that they have together.
In this case, we have a situation where the program recipient is.... This isn't an isolated case. We have many cases of this in here. For the user of this information trying to understand what your department is spending money on, there is ambiguity and uncertainty around what it actually means when a particular recipient is identified.
Is this something you acknowledge needs to be cleaned up, so the public can actually understand what's going on?