That's a very good question. At the moment, it's an issue of accountability. There's nothing in the audit that suggests that there is any case of fraud.
I think the most valid point in the audit is about information management. The fact is that sometimes the documentation is included, and sometimes it is not included. You have to go back to find it and so on. We don't have a case of fraud. We don't have one situation where we can talk about fraud. It would be even hard to say that it's about program inefficiencies or programs not getting the results. That's not what it is about. It's more to make sure that you have all the controls in place. There are a lot of controls in Gs and Cs programming. From the get-go, from the beginning, for the whole life cycle, there are some that are working better than others. We want all of them to work well and great. That's why we're doing it.