It's very different from case to case, and that will remain even if we have a more centralized approach.
There are contribution agreements or programs for which the organizations have already been identified. There are programs we manage that are really funds for specific organizations with which we work, so there isn't a call for proposals. It's really more of a partnership.
There are cases where we have programs with provinces. We don't select provinces. They've been selected by the Constitution, if I can say that, and the history of this country.
We have programs for which we have calls for proposals, and they're more classic, typical programs that people apply for.
It really depends on a case-by-case basis.
If you look at, for example, the programs under the EDF, which is a statutory program, the funding is under court action. The court directs us on how to spend the money, and we go and spend the money. Those are cases like the Volkswagen case.
It's really different from program to program. The important point is that they should all ask the same questions about what the best approach is for them based on criteria, not just because I want to do it this way or that way. That's what a structure should do. That's a good mix between normalization and flexibility.
There's no one-size-fits-all solution, but there should be an approach that allows you to understand what the tools are and what they mean.