In most of my career, including my study, I've worked with indigenous groups, and I'm always concerned by that, so I really appreciate your question.
In our case, I think it's also due to the fact that it is a new partnership. It's not because they're an indigenous organization. It's also because they're a new organization that we were not working with necessarily in the past. You know, I mentioned Ducks Unlimited and other organizations or provinces. We have track records of decades of work with those organizations. When our people come and say, “I have a contribution agreement with them,” the question of their capacity to deliver or not is quite easy to answer.
When you go with a new organization that is an indigenous organization, there's an issue. That's why we need to make a special effort on this. I mentioned that we have a director general who's in charge of engagement with first nations, Inuit and Métis. It is something we need to do with organizations, as well as working with Indigenous Services Canada and other organizations—because, at the end of the day, they're sometimes the same groups—on how to better assess the level of risk and how the level of risk should impose more on us and not necessarily on them. Some of it is also on us. It's up to us to do our homework, not necessarily asking them to do more on their side. How do we use capacity funding to actually eliminate some of the burden that could come with proposing something new?