Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Tremblay, I'm going to go back to the question I asked earlier.
I can understand, as you explained, that you don't ask a company what it is going to do with the money it receives. That money is financial support to be used towards achieving a goal.
That said, the audit says that recipients “[h]owever … may be required to report on results achieved”.
Why is it not a requirement? Companies have to show us the results achieved, because what they are going to do will possibly be applied across Quebec or Canada. That may be useful later on. Why is it not a requirement? Why is it only a possibility? Why isn't it mandatory to report on results, even if those results are negative, which could happen?