Again, I'm just speaking to the precedent that we've said that we don't call chiefs of staff. Again, we know that the ministers are accountable for their staff. The minister is coming. She will answer the questions that we need answers to.
With regard to the other two people who are listed, I think it is important to hear from them. We've heard testimony today that speaks to their potential additional information that could inform the conversation that occurred that led to the second email, so we're very much amenable to that. However, again, I don't think the chief of staff to the minister is going to enrich...because the minister is going to be the one to speak on behalf of and to represent her team.
Based on that, I support the amendment, for sure, and I wouldn't be supportive without that.
Thank you.