I have a couple of questions. Again, thank you for being here. I've learned a lot today.
One of the things I want to come back to is that many indigenous applicants were labelled medium or high risk. With regard to that review process, there was a clear identification that there wasn't really any paperwork providing a meaningful rationale for it. I appreciate that they were reviewed and that there's an ongoing process in place to address that issue, but what does that mean for the people who currently have an agreement?
When that issue was identified, was anything done with the current agreements? We know the oversight requirements increase.
There are a lot of additional administration costs for recipients when they are rated this way. If there's nothing saying why they were rated this way, what happens in your process to provide feedback about what should happen with those current agreements that have not been properly dealt with?