Thank you.
Just to follow up on that very specifically, if you've got an instance where a company is on the indigenous business list and is benefiting from that program, and then they're removed from the list, maybe because there was some misrepresentation involved or abuse of joint ventures, it seems pretty bizarre to me that after that misrepresentation they would still be allowed to benefit from government contracts. If they're removed from the list because of misrepresentation, they shouldn't just be no longer on that list but still able to benefit from government contracts. If there have been abuses, they should be barred from government contracts in general.
It seems that indigenous identity fraud isn't being taken seriously by the government at the same level as we might hope they are taking on other instances of fraud.
In the time I have left, do you want to follow up on that point?