Thank you, Mr. Chair.
On Tuesday, we discussed an amendment that had the effect of reducing the time for Mr. Clark's appearance to one hour. When it is necessary for testimony to be clarified, it is usual to request an additional appearance. It would also seem that there was some agreement around the table on this.
In fact, in looking for assurance of that agreement this morning, I heard that Mr. Clark had, was to have, will have to, or will—I don't know which tense of the verb to use—intended to write to the committee. In any event, I wondered whether we had received any communication from Mr. Clark other than what we received in August.
I have just seen it come up in my email inbox.
Would it be useful to know what the content of that communication is before continuing the discussion?
We are talking about Mr. Clark now.