Of course. The bottom line is that he is the head of the mission. Someone five, six or 10 layers below him is not going to make a decision to GAC that says, in my view, this official residence is no longer suitable and we need an immediate replacement. That comes from the top, and it's filtered down. That was a direction made by Tom Clark.
He influenced GAC in making this decision. Isn't that correct? He was instrumental. He gave the green light. He has lied to this committee. Do you agree that he has lied to this committee?