It made false claims in the process of making bids. That's what's been reported. You're saying that it wasn't on the indigenous business list, but then it nonetheless claimed to be an indigenous business because it thought that would provide it some advantage when making those bids. That's still identity fraud. Regardless of whether it was successful in getting that particular contract or whether it was on that list, it still clearly misrepresented itself.
Do you think GHI committed indigenous identity fraud, regardless of the outcome, and was that a factor in the decision to suspend it?