Thank you, Chair.
There's a question I would like a little bit of clarity on. I understand that there haven't been any charges—that you're aware of—of businesses using a false identity to get contracts and to get resources for that. That is concerning to me.
It also sounds to me like the only pathway forward is simply to remove a business from the list. I would hope that there would be a higher level of accountability. Just removing a business from the list is a very passive action. It doesn't really address the fact there has been an element of fraud and that people are claiming indigenous identity when the community does not see that as belonging to them.
Are there any actions beyond simply removing the business from the list? Are there any discussions about looking at that and making sure there's a level of accountability that is higher?