For the first one, in terms of the certification processes and the new process we found with CCIB, with CAMSC—which is a separate one—and with the federal government's indigenous business registry, they were all very similar. We had to provide information on who we are as a company, what we did, our board construct and our ownership. There was validation in all three circumstances that the principal owners of the company were indeed indigenous, which entitled us to be registered as an indigenous company. I guess that's the answer there.
There were some subtle differences between the three of them, but they were essentially trying to establish who we were, and that we were who we said we were.
I'm sorry. What was the second part of the question, sir?