As we noted in our opening remarks, we have a mechanism with the Crown to do work on joint priorities. The Government of Canada and Inuit have jointly decided that for the purposes of procurement defining an Inuit business is something that we all want to work on.
As a threshold matter, just defining who is Inuit is a top-level issue. It is a separate issue we had worked on through that mechanism, just to specify that when we're talking about Inuit in Canada, the federal government, ITK and ITOs agree who the collective rights holders are—that is to say, the Inuit treaty organizations enlisted them. Each of those treaty organizations, in turn, has its own definition for what constitutes an Inuit business within their region or for their members. Then, we're working with the Government of Canada to deal with those issues where there may be Inuit businesses that involve Inuit from multiple treaty organizations as well.
However, that's really just to provide the definitional basis to be able to measure and assess whether a recipient of a contract is, in fact, an Inuit business consistent with federal policy as well as the definitions developed by ITOs.