Well, that's the thing. The direct and the indirect aspects allow the business to basically do its best to bring back that value to the economy. In some cases, what you're going to find is that a piece of technology is already sourced. It is largely “off the shelf”, let's call it, and the amount of customization is very limited, so the ability for that company to work right on the platform is quite low, and therefore they would do a lot of indirect work. A good example would be an airplane platform. It would have a lot of indirect work versus direct work, just simply because it's sourced elsewhere, outside of Canada.
I would say that members are very split on how useful ITBs are to them. In the case of the shipyards, I think the shipyards have made tremendous use of ITBs. When we are purchasing a platform that is made outside of Canada, I believe that a lot of the foreign companies prefer the indirect ITBs, because they are not necessarily interested in replacing their sourcing mechanisms—which could be in the United States, for example—with a Canadian firm.