Thanks, Mr. Chair.
I'll address Mr. Kusmierczyk.
I have to address the fact that we're going to spend $200 billion on ships and planes. We owe more than.... I think we had Irving for 45 minutes, and they're getting $100 billion from Canada. This study obviously has to continue. Hopefully, it will be like past studies, which we interrupted to do other studies. I think, at one time, we had three studies going on at the same time. I think the estimates study ran for three years, off and on, so we can certainly accommodate what you're talking about, Mr. Kusmierczyk, while we continue this.
I'm wondering if this can be changed. Can we focus on the change orders—the documentation regarding changes to the existing design, structural failings, etc.—rather than on invoices chasing a $400 bolt? Let's focus on the change orders, design problems and production issues. I'm not exactly sure how to word that in today's motion, but perhaps it would alleviate some of the worries about how many pages will show up. I do care about a $400 bolt, but I'm more concerned about what is leading to this systemic issue we have: our inability to get an existing, mature, successful plane designed, built and delivered for Canada. We're not even in the process of starting up an airline-building industry. Someone else is building that for us.
I'm open to suggestions on how we can address this.