Thank you, Ms. Vignola.
I should point out that we're talking about the amendment now.
Firstly, the documents requested do not cover the entire contract, but rather the expenses involved in the technical and mechanical problems. I'm not talking about the initial contract or the totality of the work. I want to know the details from the moment problems were encountered. It's more limited. I want to know why the project is stalled, what costs were generated by these problems and where we stand at the moment.
The actual motion that we voted on, last week or the week before, has to do with aviation projects, but does not clearly address these aspects.
What we really want to know is what happened and why Canada is still unable to use these 16 aircraft. If we want to know, we will need documents. We already know that there is an additional $150 million, but that's all we know.
Why do we have this problem? As Mr. McCAuley mentioned, Airbus manufactures this aircraft for at least 15 countries. Why is the project on hold in Canada? It's a public safety problem for search and rescue operations.
The motion is only about these documents; I don't want all the documents pertaining to the contract from the outset.