Sure.
Quickly, the policy change you're referring to is the decision to provide the Canada workers benefit in anticipation to lower-income workers and middle-income workers, but to also not recoup these advance payments should these workers earn more than the maximum threshold. That last part was not announced in the fall economic statement.
I took issue with the fact that that part was not transparently announced in the fall statement, and also with the fact that this change would mean that we could well end up with a situation where somebody who earns $20,000 in a year gets advance payments for the Canada workers benefit the next year, which I think is not a bad thing at all, but in that year for which he or she gets the advance payments, they make $100,000—because they've improved their own situation—and the government decides not to recoup these advance payments.
My question is whether this is the best use of these funds to allocate money to those who earn more than the maximum under the Canada workers benefit.