No. To your point, when I was going through the focus of this study, there is a....
I said earlier that McKinsey was a distraction, but I should clarify. On the issue of how to make the public service more resilient and to better manage procurement, I think the focus on McKinsey can be distracting. But there is an interesting policy question around this: At what point does a firm's broader ethical behaviour and values mean that they're just, like, a no-go zone? Do we want to start developing rules around that?
I mean, I'm not an expert on McKinsey's particular history, but I read the news like everybody, and yes, there are some really problematic lines on their CV. Yes, it's a legitimate question to ask if that's something the federal government would want to examine. To me, that's a distinct issue, though, from reform in procurement as a larger issue and what I think are the more immediate problems with how we run procurement in Canada.