Okay.
Sir, you said in your opening statement that McKinsey followed all the rules and that these were competitive contracts assessed by public servants. All the rules were followed. That's a similar line we received from ministers.
The problem is that your talking points aren't up to date, because the government released a press release on Friday that said, “there are indications that certain administrative requirements and procedures were not consistently followed”. I don't think the government would issue a press release admitting that they didn't follow all of the rules in their procurement with McKinsey if they weren't sure that they hadn't followed the rules. The government wouldn't release a press release like that, saying that they had failed to follow the rules if they had been following all the rules.
Do you want to acknowledge that certain administrative requirements and procedures weren't consistently followed, and do you want to share with us why that happened?