Hello.
There were a number of changes that you requested we make to the report, a handful of them. The first one is that we are proposing a title, which is to be more in line with other similar reports in the House. The title proposed is “Question of Privilege on Providing Documents to the Committee.”
Another change we made was, since the last report, another department, ESDC, finished their submission, so we updated the number of departments that had not completed.... The number that have not completed is now eight instead of nine, and we updated the date of that to April 6.
We also removed the annex because that, again, is not a normal procedure in a report to the House. It doesn't really have any extra information that the House needs to make a finding of contempt or lack of privilege.
Then, we added several paragraphs from Ms. Vignola's motion about the quality of the French-language documents. We singled out three organizations: Canada Post, Public Sector Pension Investment Board and ESDC. The first two submitted unverified AI translations, quite openly. They acknowledged that's what they did. ESDC had English pages where French pages should have been submitted. There were a number of English pages in the French version of the document. When they resubmitted it, with all the extra 227 pages, those English pages were still there.
Then finally, we added an explicit statement that we would like to draw a breach of privilege to the House at the very end.
That's it.