Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Garon, thank you for being with us. Congratulations. I know that you always work very hard as a member. I am very pleased that your bill is being studied.
I am going to continue in the same vein as Mr. Fergus.
I am a little worried about removing the requirement that the disclosure be made in good faith and that the person have reasonable grounds to believe that they suffered reprisals. Mr. Fergus was trying to find a way to satisfy everyone.
Mr. Garon and Mr. Roche, do you agree that we should at least include the requirement that the whistle-blower should reasonably believe that what they are disclosing is true? I would not want a person to be able to disclose something that they believed to be false, even if it seems true on the surface. Perhaps there is a different way of wording “good faith”. Is that possible?