As I said earlier, this is still a step forward. Only time will tell if these two additions are sufficient. We're not sure, but clearly it is a major step forward. Adding these two categories ensures that a greater number of wrongdoings are captured. I think foreign interference has to be added.
What I must stress, Mr. Johns, is that the bill also provides for a review mechanism every five years—which is not the case in the current act. The political world and the government's organizational structure and management methods change, so it's critical that the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act constantly adapt and that it be enshrined in the act. That alone is an important innovation, and will allow us to carry out further analyses and discussions. Once the bill has been passed and implemented, we can ask ourselves in five years whether the environment has changed enough to warrant new categories. This mechanism will likely be very beneficial to the legislation, since, clearly, updating the act has rarely been a priority.