If I could just jump in quickly, I was just going to say that what Tom and I have been arguing internationally and what he said so eloquently is that whistle-blowing is really about institutional accountability. It isn't really about the whistle-blower. I think that is what gets missed when these laws are passed: We focus so much on how the individual delivers the message, and whether they did it in the appropriate way. If you think about the purpose of the law being ensuring the free flow of information for institutional accountability, that's absolutely essential. That's what's kept me going.
The other thing I would say is all the witnesses.... It is a citizen's charter, really, and it does depend on that. I set up and helped to work with the Whistleblowing International Network because civil society engagement means that it keeps everyone—including charities, and I run a charity—on their toes for their decision-making. It is so important that you're listening to the whistle-blowers and you're listening to those who have been working in the field of non-profits. They're the ones, with journalists as well, trying to hold power to account in a way that works for us all. It's not about the blame game. It's about making it work.