That's not quite what I'm proposing.
I think the definition being proposed is problematic, but we do recognize the importance of defining political interference. I think the best way to proceed is to not adopt BQ‑1. We really want to look at everything carefully and make sure that the regulations are consistent. The benefit of CPC‑3 is that it gives us the ability to make sure that the definition we go with is flexible and doesn't needlessly create any contradictions in the bill.