We have some choices among us here.
Thank you very much, Ms. Kusie and committee members, for supporting the subamendment.
Now the choice is.... I think Madame Vignola wanted to us to take a look at BQ-5. I'm going to ask you to think about another one, and that would be G-4.2, which is very similar.
The reason I would go with Ms. Kusie's, right off the top, is that it's very clear. It's “nonfinancial support”.
The reason I wouldn't vote for BQ-5 is that it says, “provide non-financial support”—excellent—“including assistance, advice, referrals to appropriate resources and information sharing, to a public servant who has made”, and it goes on.
The reason I'm uncomfortable with the word “referrals” is that it identifies the.... It's not at the request of the public servant. Therefore, it would identify the public servant. We want this to be a confidential process.
If the idea is to vote down CPC-4, then I would say the better option would be G-4.2. However, if we vote for CPC-4, then we'll withdraw G-4.2.