I might have confused my colleagues by what I suggested.
I just want to let you know that I'm going to come back to the same point over and over again. I'll make it once so we can save time.
Again, we're asking to vote down these clauses one by one. The reason is that a PSIC decision would already have a judicial review in the Federal Court. Removing the screening role of the commissioner and going straight to a tribunal frankly doesn't make much sense, because it's using a higher legal standard, as opposed to the lower legal standard of the commissioner.
If we allow this to stand, what we're actually going to do is cause a surge in cases to the tribunal, which will cause a surge in costs to the tribunal. It may need a royal recommendation.