Evidence of meeting #72 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cost.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Yves Giroux  Parliamentary Budget Officer, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
Kaitlyn Vanderwees  Analyst, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Aimée Belmore

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Okay, thank you.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Thank you, sir.

Mr. Giroux, it's wonderful to have you with us. I think you've been with us so much that you've earned a free coffee from us. There's some at the back that you can take on the way.

Ms. Vanderwees, thanks for being with us as well.

Before you leave, you mentioned the SSE report that you did. I'm wondering about that, and then about the report on the CSCs, the Canadian surface combatant frigates, that you did for this committee. Would you be able to update those for us and submit them back to us?

6:20 p.m.

Parliamentary Budget Officer, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer

Yves Giroux

It's something that we can certainly do. It depends on the timelines you have in mind. We could certainly consider that.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Colleagues, is there interest to have those reports updated and tabled when the PBO has them finished? This relates to the SSE report that he just mentioned and the one from 2022 for the frigates' life cycle costs.

6:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I don't have a specific date. It's just when you can get to it.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Chair, I asked the PBO a question about what it would cost for us to get to parity between mental and physical health in terms of basic mental health supports. Would it be out of order to ask the committee to request the PBO to do an analysis of what it would cost to get there?

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Do you want to put some more details into a motion?

We'll do it Monday.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

I'm happy to do that. Thanks.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I think we'll find some time to do it Monday.

Mr. Giroux and Ms. Vanderwees, again, thank you for joining us. You are dismissed.

Colleagues, before we leave, I have a couple of very quick items.

One is that we have to approve the budget for this supplementary estimates (A) exercise. It is minimal, but we still have to do it. Even though we did not spend anywhere close to the budget of $1,250 for the supplementary estimates (A), which is for a working meal and headsets, we need approval for it.

Do I have approval, colleagues?

6:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Then there are the supplementary estimates (A). Does the committee wish to vote on the supplementary estimates (A)?

I see we do. Great.

Shall vote 1a under the Department of Public Works and Government Services carry?

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES

Vote 1a—Operating expenditures..........$391,170,931

(Vote 1a agreed to on division)

Wonderful.

Shall the chair report vote 1a under the Department of Public Works and Government Services to the House?

6:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Wonderful. That is all, colleagues. Thank you very much.

Mr. Giroux and Ms. Vanderwees, again, thank you very much.

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

Mr. Chair, can you give us some insight into the Monday and Wednesday agendas, please?

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Sorry; before you leave, colleagues....

We're not adjourned.

Monday will be the departments on McKinsey. We will have a short discussion with our clerk about the McKinsey documents. Wednesday—that's the 21st—we have open, and I think we said we'd do Bill C-290.

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

Okay. Is that a firm decision?

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

That's always been what the Monday is. We have Wednesday open. We can certainly discuss—

6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

I just want to make sure that Julie is also aware.

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

June 21 is too late for us to get it to the House.

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

That's fine. I just want to make sure she understands.

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

We've had the discussion.

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

You've had that discussion with her already. Okay.

6:25 p.m.

Bloc

Julie Vignola Bloc Beauport—Limoilou, QC

Why isn't it Monday?

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Monday we have the department heads for the McKinsey documents. That had been bumped from other past meetings and also bumped for one of the Bill C-290 meetings. We'll hear from the department heads on redacting the McKinsey documents this Monday. The witnesses have already been invited.

Wednesday is open. We can do Bill C-290, but it will still be too late. Even if we finish it, it'll be too late to get it to the House in time, but we did, of course, in the vote today, receive the House's approval to add 30 sitting days, so we can finish it in September or October and get it to the House once it has been amended.