Basically, G-6 is meant to reverse the removal of the prohibition if starting a different proceeding under a different act for a reprisal. It would prevent overlap with other recourse mechanisms for reprisals, which could allow for multiple processes being conducted on the same issues by different administrative bodies with different mandates and objectives. In my view, that would waste resources and create inconsistent determinations and different remedies.
Coming back to this, it would say you have to go through one recourse mechanism for reprisals, and I think that's a better way to do it.
That's the purpose of G-6.
Thanks, Mr. Chair, and I'm sorry about my microphone.