Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think it's common sense that when you're picking an action before one administrative tribunal, you're not supposed to have parties take actions before multiple different administrative tribunals at the same time. The reason is simple. You'll have contradictory decisions. You'll have all kinds of flaws in terms of resources, because you would have to put resources in front of two or three tribunals instead of one.
In my view, if you want to take court action, you are not going to launch it in front of the court of appeals, the superior court, and the court of Quebec at the same time. You wouldn't be allowed to do that. It would create unreasonable bureaucracy. It would also cause time delays and all three different judges having to deal with the same issue.
It just doesn't make logical sense to me. I believe the line should be deleted. Again, I would call upon the common sense of my colleagues to see that it makes sense to not have alternative mechanisms.