Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My understanding is that the way clause 40 is drafted, it's removing the number of a section that now is not removed from the act. By adopting G-6 and deleting the other line, clause 40 has to be defeated, or it should be defeated consequentially. It's essentially changing two references, subject to two subsections, to one, and we retain the other subsection. Either it would be consequentially defeated or I recommend that we defeat it.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.