Mr. Chair, I'm confused as to the reason for ruling LIB-12 out of order. If somehow you're ruling that there was...with LIB-7 defeated, and that's what added the reference to 12(2).... I'm not quite sure.
If that's the case, then why would we not remove the words under subsection 12(2) and just say that if a matter is referred to the Commissioner under 24(2.1)...? I'm just confused as to your rationale for why this is out of order, so if you wouldn't mind explaining it, sir....