Okay, this is the last one. After “real property portfolio to build”, I propose that we add “market and” before “non-market housing”.
We're looking at a study to identify opportunities. We can look at the arguments for and against market and non-market housing, what's appropriate and in what context, but I would suggest that in the context of the study we look at the possibility and the opportunities for both. That will provide a broader look at the situation and the opportunities, and it will provide people with an opportunity to argue against market housing, if that's their view. Let's look at it as well. Let's not exclude it from consideration.
It would be revised to read, “a study to identify opportunities within the Government of Canada's real property portfolio to build market and non-market housing”.