On part one, the CITT, I think I'll go back to my previous comment. Every defence and marine procurement, once detailed from a requirements point of view, is fairly massive. There are many technical requirements. Many of them are mandatory. Some of them are desirable. There are different assessments and different criteria. Sometimes the interpretation of a criterion can differ from one party to another.
I think we are doing really well. We don't do this job alone. Technical requirements are evaluated with the client department. In the CITT case here, for the Terry Fox vessel life extension, the Canadian Coast Guard is with us. They are the technical authority for the procurement. We're there from a process point of view and for good stewardship of the solicitation. ISED is also in the room to make sure we respect any Canadian economic benefits we may have associated with a project.
We take this job very seriously. We're laser-focused every time there's a bid evaluation. In many cases, we have fairness monitors. In many cases, we have software to assist us in determining the compliance and the winning bidder.