Thank you for the question.
Maybe I'll give a couple of high-level reflections on the matter.
In PSPC, we run a very rigorous solicitation process based on the requirements of our client departments, as per my introductory notes. These requirements are very technical. Some of them are very focused on management.
In this case here, we're talking about a work period for a shipyard for a vessel's life extension, which was quite involved. There is a huge amount of technical requirements. When some of these requirements are assessed, each one comes in with criteria. The implementation of these criteria sometimes can be different from one body of people to another. For me, it's a reflection on the entirety of the case.
Because the case was quite complex, it involved a couple of rounds of submissions to the tribunal. I think if I have a more personal reflection, it would be to make sure that all parties involved fully understand the matter at stake at the outset. I think it triggered, unfortunately, a second round of complaints, more analysis and more deliberations—