I certainly can. I think that's a mischaracterization of our report. We did take into account the direct, indirect and induced economic impacts of the battery plants in our report.
I think it's Mr. Volpe you're referring to. Where he takes offence or where he has concerns with our report is that the Trillium Network report—which is the basis on which the government decided to go with the five-year return on investment—also assumed that there would be a whole ecosystem that would be built, including electric vehicle assembly plants, but we have yet to see a Volkswagen assembly plant. We took out these other aspects because they have not materialized yet. In the Trillium report, they say that all of these other things would require additional subsidies, so to take a more reasonable approach, we looked at the direct, indirect and induced economic impacts of the battery plants themselves, taking into account that these would lead to spillover effects, as every major investment does.
Speaking to the soundness of our approach, the Government of Quebec and the Government of Canada—ISED—used the same methodology as we did for Volkswagen and Stellantis to assess the economic impact of the Northvolt investment that was announced a couple of weeks later.