Thank you.
I'm sorry, but I have to answer in English. My French needs work.
The situation, I think, is that I was interviewed almost 20 years ago by a CBC reporter about a past information technology scandal. I said that it's not surprising at all. You have middle-level executives who don't know computers very well trying to make huge computer purchases. Of course they're going to choose wrong.
We need to have a system put in place of people in house, in the public service, who know what they're doing. Then, if you want to have people like GC Strategies, you just pay them as advisers. They should not be getting 20% to 30% commissions for finding subcontractors. Just pay them as advisers for a contracting process to do a due diligence as to whether the companies that are bidding have competence. Then they would be paid...not $11 million to give that advice.
It's a capacity issue. It's existed for 20 years. I think if you looked at any big business you would find the same thing. For a long period of time, you had middle executives who had no expertise in computers and technology making huge technology purchases, and screwing up and wasting a bunch of money most of the time.